Welcome to Bracket Yard’s home for the 2025 college basketball bracket update. Some websites call it “bracketology.” Our website has “bracket” in the name so I think it just goes without saying that we would get involved in such a thing.
Anyway, we will periodically update the below between now and Selection Sunday in March 2025. Is your team on track to make the tournament? Are they destined to fall short and sadden your educational institution of choice? All will be revealed.
2025 College Basketball Bracket Update
Last Updated: January 20, 2025
A note on “AQ” teams: Our determination for the conference champions below is based off of the team which had the highest NET ranking on the date we issued this update.
Bracket Update: S-Curve (All Teams Ranked 1-68)
# | Team | Conf | AQ/At-Large |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Auburn | SEC | AQ |
2 | Duke | ACC | AQ |
3 | Alabama | SEC | AL |
4 | Iowa State | Big East | AL |
5 | Tennessee | SEC | AL |
6 | Purdue | Big Ten | AL |
7 | Florida | SEC | AL |
8 | Kansas | Big 12 | AL |
9 | Houston | Big 12 | AQ |
10 | Kentucky | SEC | AL |
11 | Ole Miss | SEC | AL |
12 | Marquette | Big East | AQ |
13 | Oregon | Big Ten | AL |
14 | Illinois | Big Ten | AQ |
15 | Michigan State | Big Ten | AL |
16 | Mississippi State | SEC | AL |
17 | Michigan | Big Ten | AL |
18 | Texas A&M | SEC | AL |
19 | Arizona | Big 12 | AL |
20 | Wisconsin | Big Ten | AL |
21 | Gonzaga | WCC | AQ |
22 | Connecticut | Big East | AL |
23 | Memphis | American | AQ |
24 | West Virginia | Big 12 | AL |
25 | Louisville | ACC | AL |
26 | Clemson | ACC | AL |
27 | Utah State | MWC | AQ |
28 | Texas Tech | Big 12 | AL |
29 | Creighton | Big East | AL |
30 | St. John’s | Big East | AL |
31 | UCLA | Big Ten | AL |
32 | Missouri | SEC | AL |
33 | Georgia | SEC | AL |
34 | Baylor | Big 12 | AL |
35 | Vanderbilt | SEC | AL |
36 | Pittsburgh | ACC | AL |
37 | Oklahoma | SEC | AL |
38 | Saint Mary’s | WCC | AL |
39 | San Diego State | MWC | AL |
40 | Maryland | Big Ten | AL |
41 | North Carolina | ACC | AL |
42 | Ohio State | Big Ten | AL |
43 | Iowa | Big Ten | AL |
44 | Texas | SEC | AL |
45 | Cincinnati | Big 12 | AL |
46 | UC-Irvine | Big West | AQ |
47 | Drake | MVC | AQ |
48 | VCU | A-10 | AQ |
49 | McNeese | Southland | AQ |
50 | Arkansas State | Sun Belt | AQ |
51 | North Dakota State | Summit | AQ |
52 | Liberty | C-USA | AQ |
53 | Grand Canyon | WAC | AQ |
54 | Lipscomb | A-Sun | AQ |
55 | Yale | Ivy | AQ |
56 | UNC-Greensboro | Southern | AQ |
57 | Akron | MAC | AQ |
58 | Northern Colorado | Big Sky | AQ |
59 | High Point | Big South | AQ |
60 | Elon | CAA | AQ |
61 | Purdue-Fort Wayne | Horizon | AQ |
62 | Central Connecticut State | NEC | AQ |
63 | Southern | SWAC | AQ |
64 | Quinnipiac | MAAC | AQ |
65 | Bryant | Am East | AQ |
66 | Norfolk State | MEAC | AQ |
67 | Little Rock | OVC | AQ |
68 | Colgate | Patriot | AQ |
Last Eight In
8 | Saint Mary’s | WCC |
7 | San Diego State | MWC |
6 | Maryland | Big Ten |
5 | North Carolina | ACC |
4 | Ohio State | Big Ten |
3 | Iowa | Big Ten |
2 | Texas | SEC |
1 (Last) | Cincinnati | Big 12 |
First Ten Out
1 | Arizona State | Big 12 |
2 | Nebraska | Big Ten |
3 | SMU | ACC |
4 | UCF | Big 12 |
5 | Northwestern | Big Ten |
6 | Xavier | Big East |
7 | New Mexico | MWC |
8 | Indiana | Big Ten |
9 | Penn State | Big Ten |
10 | Arkansas | SEC |
2025 College Basketball Bracket Update: Projected Bracket
MIDWEST REGION (INDIANAPOLIS)
Lexington, Kentucky
1 | Duke (ACC)* |
16 | Bryant (AmEast)* OR Norfolk State (MEAC)* |
8 | St. John’s (Big East) |
9 | Vanderbilt (SEC) |
Providence, Rhode Island
4 | Mississippi State (SEC) |
13 | North Dakota State (Summit)* |
5 | Michigan (Big Ten) |
12 | Arkansas State (Sun Belt)* |
Wichita, Kansas
3 | Houston (American) |
14 | High Point (Big South)* |
6 | Louisville (ACC) |
11 | Ohio State (Big Ten) OR Texas (SEC) |
Raleigh, North Carolina
2 | Tennessee (SEC) |
15 | Central Connecticut State (NEC)* |
7 | Clemson (ACC) |
10 | San Diego State (MWC) |
SOUTH REGION (ATLANTA)
Lexington, Kentucky
1 | Auburn (SEC)* |
16 | Little Rock (OVC)* or Colgate (Patriot)* |
8 | Creighton (Big East) |
9 | Missouri (SEC) |
Denver, Colorado
4 | Illinois (Big Ten) |
13 | Lipscomb (A-Sun)* |
5 | Arizona (Big 12) |
12 | Drake (MVC)* |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
3 | Kentucky (SEC) |
14 | Akron(MAC)* |
6 | Connecticut (Big East) |
11 | Cincinnati (Big 12) |
Cleveland, Ohio
2 | Purdue (Big Ten) |
15 | Purdue-Fort Wayne (Horizon)* |
7 | Texas Tech (Big 12) |
10 | Oklahoma (SEC) |
EAST REGION (NEWARK)
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
1 | Alabama (SEC) |
16 | Quinnipiac (MAAC)* |
8 | UCLA (Big Ten) |
9 | Baylor (Big 12) |
Providence, Rhode Island
4 | Michigan State (Big Ten) |
13 | Yale (Ivy)* |
5 | Texas A&M (SEC) |
12 | VCU (A-10)* |
Seattle, Washington
3 | Oregon (Big Ten) |
14 | Grand Canyon (WAC)* |
6 | Gonzaga (WCC)* |
11 | UC-Irvine (Big West)* |
Raleigh, North Carolina
2 | Florida (SEC) |
15 | Elon (CAA)* |
7 | West Virginia (Big 12) |
10 | Maryland (Big Ten) |
WEST REGION (SAN FRANCISCO)
Cleveland, Ohio
1 | Iowa State (Big 12) |
16 | Southern (SWAC)* |
8 | Georgia (SEC) |
9 | Pittsburgh (ACC) |
Denver, Colorado
4 | Marquette (Big East)* |
13 | Liberty (C-USA)* |
5 | Wisconsin (Big Ten) |
12 | McNeese (Southland)* |
Wichita, Kansas
3 | Ole Miss (SEC) |
14 | UNC-Greensboro (Southern)* |
6 | Memphis (American)* |
11 | North Carolina (ACC) |
Seattle, Washington
2 | Kansas (Big 12) |
15 | Northern Colorado (Big Sky)* |
7 | Utah State (MWC)* |
10 | Saint Mary’s (WCC) |
Bracket Update Notes (Most Recent at Top)
January 20
It took a perfect storm of losing a big game and other teams in position doing well, but Marquette dropped from the final one seed to a four. On the S-Curve, they were actually in position for a three, but sacrifices had to be made to keep the same conference out of too many pods, and not overly screw top teams on travel.
Auburn and Duke are the two teams to beat this season.
Ohio State is a team that we have in, but they almost do not deserve it. Just the teams below them deserve it a little less. Nebraska has played its way out of the field for now, losing four in a row.
January 15
We issued a brief video update to account for a busy day in college basketball the night earlier, with a few changes to the top four lines.
January 14
A few big shake-ups, as a little bit of movement can produce a large swing in NET. There were some teams that had wins convert into Quadrants 1 and 2, which is how we ended up with Arizona and Texas Tech back in the dance.
Marquette has a very strong resume, about as good as Iowa State’s. It was difficult picking between them for the last 1-seed.
Oregon has one of the better resumes out there, with seven Q1 wins, and I looked for ways to push them onto the 2-line. Alas, they are one spot short because the others in front of them did not deserve to fall back off of it.
We were a little more generous this time with Houston, but they need to resolve the situation of no Q1 wins. They are nowhere near being a 1-seed as a result, despite their high NET.
Iowa is in, but a little iffy. They are the only at-large besides Houston (at the moment) to have no Q1 wins.
January 6
This is our first round of bracket assembly for the year. At this point, there are a lot of undeveloped resumes, so I would not get too bent out of shape if your preferred team is not here. Give it about a month for conference play to seep in, and we should have a much better view of where a particular team is going by February.
One team I find particularly interesting is Texas Tech. They have a high NET ranking, but their resume is undeserving of the tournament otherwise. Some other prognosticators have them in, but we do not.
If Memphis did not have that Quad 3 loss, they would be a high seed. Aside from that, they have one of the more impressive team sheets so far.
Marquette has an excellent resume to this point, and one that I think is deserving of a one-seed. Not everyone agrees, but this should make the Golden Eagles fans very happy.
We have Houston as a five despite their very high NET ranking, and even at that, it’s kind of generous. They have no Quad 1 wins as of yet while every other team between 1 and 38, except them, on our S-Curve has at least one. Most have at least two. If not for that NET, we would probably have them in an 8-9 matchup somewhere. The good news for them is that they still have time to work on the resume, and it needs beefing up in some way.
In two pods do we have two teams from the same conference (the SEC) potentially meeting in the second round, which would require at least one to win a play-in game. This is not ideal, but likely to change. The SEC has a lot of teams on the two, seven, and ten lines, and without wholly screwing someone out of their rightful seed, we’ll just have to live with it for the time being. As of now, we have the SEC as an eye-popping 12-bid conference, which is in part due to them being good and in part due to the conference being gigantic. It is almost unavoidable that some will encounter each other.